Applications was the one class where I probably should have been keeping a blog the whole time but didn’t require me to keep it. We had some interesting people come in to give us a look at their work, such as Vita Acconci, Mya Lin, Bob Greenberg of R/GA, Craig Newmark, the design team at Antennae (who did the MTA ticket machines), the guy who is doing the interactive art for the 9/11 Memorial. We also had former students and a woman who had some interesting ideas about ambient reminders that you aren’t breathing when you use your computer.
But, we all, in groups of four or five, had to present to the full class a reaction to a speaker. Our presentation was in October (I think) and we were paired with the head of content at the New York Hall of Science in the World’s Fair Park. My group partners were Josh Clayton, Mark Triant, and Soo Yun Yun.

This was probably the hardest assignment I had all semester in terms of working in a group. There really isn’t anyone in ITP that I don’t like, but the pressure of presenting to the full class (including Red) combined with meeting these people for the first time contributed to some tense moments as we labored over the language of four questions. Josh and I were probably the farthest apart in terms of personality, but I really appreciated having the chance to speak to his Mom and get a peek of where he comes from. I would rely on Mark’s intelligence to answer a lot of very complex questions that I wouldn’t ask other people. Soo Yun is a beautiful artist and someone who draws me into being a better version of myself.
We had some ideas before visiting the museum, but it was really the experience of playing with each other and seeing how children and parents marveled at the same exhibits that led to our presentation. I noticed a father and his child both going nuts over the same optical illusion that I was bowled over by, and I thought, “wouldn’t it be interesting to call someone’s parents and ask about that moment.” We chatted about it over lunch and went with the idea. In the end, we wanted everyone to pair up with someone, call someone that knew them well, and hand over the phone to their partner who would ask these four questions:
- Tell me about a time this person has learned something from you.
- What is something you hope for this person to learn?
- What pushed this person to learn?
- What is this person up to in graduate school?
There was endless debate over these questions. Finding the right balance of text that wouldn’t be leading but also extract what we wanted was a big challenge, and at times I was overly aggressive to move things in the direction I believed in. I am usually pretty good at navigating group dynamics, but in this case, especially at ITP, there are bound to be people who are just as committed to their ideas as I am, and they’re not necessarily compatible. It was a very interesting exercise in design collaboration, as long as you don’t take it personally.
We were worried that people wouldn’t have anyone to call. That problem largely solved itself, and a few minutes after getting into the exercise (with 120+ people in pairs), I realized that it was going better than expected. I wish I had photos of the event itself. Todd Holoubek was running around with a camera, but I’m not sure what he does with all those shots.
So, we managed to succeed in getting almost everyone to call their parents and have them interviewed by a complete stranger about very personal things. This was an exercise in: getting to know your partner, getting to know yourself, sharing your experience at ITP with your loved ones, and showing how we learn at our core. Much better than hiding everyone’s shit and making them find it. We got a lot of positive feedback, and I hope that even more than the students, the parents, friends, boyfriends etc. will remember the experience.